Showing posts with label Andrew Barrett. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Andrew Barrett. Show all posts

Tuesday, 4 August 2015

Sword of Damocles by Andrew Barrett

Eddie Collins the SOCO guy is back.  This time he's investigating a murder that might just go back a long way.

I do like a good murder death kill story and since the author works as a crime scene examiner I feel that the story has "bones" so to speak.

The story was a bit slow to start, but it got going soon enough.  It was a good chunk of a book due to the twists and turns and many extra clues.

Eddie's personal life is going to the dogs again and there's a case that's annoying him.  Something is not quite right and so he needs to go back in time to solve it.

I enjoy reading this author's stories as they keep you interested all the way.

http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B0112A7XDS/?tag=jookuf-21


Sunday, 3 November 2013

Off The KUF Volume 1

This is the first of 3 volumes of short stories, drabbles and novellas from the KUForum's authors.
I am a big fan of many of the authors who hang out there, so I knew I'd like this book.  I was wrong, I loved it.

From the start with Lynda Wilcox's story 'Intelligence Test' to 'The Last Story' I was enthralled throughout.

I'll just mention some of my favourites.

The first one 'Intelligence Test' is a great opener.  Malcolm is up for a job which is on offer at the Foreigh Office.  The test seems way too hard in a simplistic way.  Who will get the job and what is the job anyway?

The very next story is by David Haynes and of course is one of his trademark creepy, macabre stories - a bit of a ghost story.

'Blackberry Crumble' by Cecilia Peartree is a longer "short" and I really enjoyed that one.  It is always great to read a new Auto story from David Wailing.

Rosen Trevithick has 2 parallel stories in this collection.  One is a Troll version and it is interesting to read them together.

'The Last Story' by H.K. Abell was intriguing and interesting and as it progressed it made me wonder about the sanity of the author.  The ending is well weird, but I think I liked it.  I thought it was an interesting way to finish off this collection

Of the 30 stories in this collection there was only one I didn't like, which is not bad going for such a large collection.

There are highs, there are lows, there are scares, there are laughs and there's the origin story of The Imp.  Oh and Trolls.

There are definitely some new authors here for me to go and investigate.

http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B00GDLGTCS/?tag=jookuf-21


Saturday, 1 June 2013

Black by Rose by Andrew Barrett

Black by Rose is the story of another chapter of Eddie Collins' life.  He's just had enough of all the crap in his job, so walks out.  But he's not out of the scene for long.

In the previous stories, I didn't really like Eddie.  I'm sure I'd keep well away from him if I ever met him in real life.  However in this story he is trying to keep clean (in the alcohol department, not in his abode) and seems to have a lot more heart.

Again with this author's works, as soon as I started the story, I could not put it down.  It is a decent size book - perhaps not as monster as previous ones, but I read it over 2 evenings.  Even though the content may be a bit harsh and explicit, the story is always very readable.

Another superb story.

http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B00CQR4TIO/?tag=jookuf-21


Thursday, 14 March 2013

The Third Rule by Andrew Barrett


I bought this book in it's 3 parts.  I thought it would be like the author's other trilogy, where I'd read one, then read another then come back to part 2.  Nope.  I might as well have bought this version as I couldn't stop reading it.

Some stories with multiple characters' lives beginning to come together have chapters for each character and flit back and fore.  This story spends a lot of time with a set of characters before going onto the next.  Sometimes you forget some of them as the story hasn't dealt with them for a while, but it gives a good depth to parts of the story.  In the first part, there were some characters that I didn't see the point of but after a while they became quite important to the story.

I did find the writing quite visual.  I could see the bruises and the rain and (unfortunately) the mess that the drunken characters got into.

The premise of this story was intriguing.  Three strikes and you are out.  Surely that would stop crime in its tracks.  But things aren't so black and white when there are people after more power.

This was one of those books that I couldn't put down.  My kindle came with me everywhere so I could catch another chapter or even paragraph.

This book is over 800 pages long.  I have been reading more and more shorter stories recently as there's so much good stuff about.  I'm not sure I would have started the omnibus, knowing how long it is, so approaching it in parts got me started.  But as it was, I read all three after each other and it didn't feel like a slog.

Superb.


http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B00BJM3RI0/?tag=jookuf-21



Sunday, 10 February 2013

No More Tears by Andrew Barrett

No More Tears is the finale in Andrew Barrett's "Dead Trilogy" following on from A Long Time Dead and Stealing Elgar.  You do need to have read the previous books as they folow on from each other.  As a whole they add up to over a thousand pages which is a chunky story indeed.

Taken individually, I think I like this one best.  This one is more about revenge and retribution.  It's hard to write about this one without giving anything away about the previous 2, but suffice to say, Roger is in another pickle and has to cope with what's thrown at him.

I mentioned in reviews for the previous books about my not really liking Roger as a person, but I think I've grown to like him more.  This story is about friendships and I liked that.

Now I have to start on his Third Rule series, yay :)

http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B005578L6I/?tag=jookuf-21



Sunday, 25 November 2012

Stealing Elgar by Andrew Barrett

Stealing Elgar is the second book in The Dead Trilogy.  The books introduce the character of Roger Conniston, a Scenes Of Crime Officer (SOCO).  The book does follow on from the first one and you do probably need to have read it first.  I don't think this story would be so good without the history of the first.  Roger has got himself in a bit of a pickle in this book and needs to act on his own.

I do like a bit of "murder, death kill" and this book has lots of all of this.  It's a police procedural type book only from a SOCO point of view.  The author is a crime scene officer, so the story has that extra dimension of reality where it describes the evidence gathering.

I found this quite an easy read.  I wanted to do another chapter, then another.  I don't think I really like many of the characters in this book.  They are certainly all very flawed.  

And onto the third (and final?) book.

http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B0055607V6/?tag=jookuf-21



Thursday, 8 November 2012

Interrogating Andrew Barrett


I can't believe that I have got up to my 50th interview since starting back in the spring.  And this 50th is certainly a great read.  So eyes down and see what goes on in the mind of someone who is closer to real murders that most people would want to be.


How do you strike the balance between writing something you want to write and writing something that people want to read, in terms of the compromises you make, if any?

I believe that you can’t please everyone all of the time. So I don’t try to. I write in a fairly gentle style that I hope will appeal to most readers. I do have some rules of my own though: there are certain profanities that I will never use (I like my stories to be as true to life as possible, but there are boundaries), and certain subjects I’ll never go near because I find them too upsetting to write about, let alone read about – and that’s not because of any personal involvement with them; I just think some things shouldn’t be fictionalised, not by me anyway. And I also have to be careful not to break a professional code and give away any of our most modern examination techniques, particularly if flirting with a terrorism theme for example. Also, I’m constrained by the Official Secrets Act and several others, so I have to be careful. But despite these ‘compromises’, or perhaps because of them, I live in the eternal hope that people will want to read what I write.


What excites, attracts or appeals to you about the genre(s) you write in.

Helping to catch the bad guys in real life gives me a buzz. And it’s the same writing in the crime/thriller genre too. But within the confines of a book I can be extrovert, I can create characters that are extreme; caricatures that I can shove into warped surroundings where they encounter depraved people, and see how they handle them. Of course, the depraved people have stories of their own too, and often these can be more fascinating than those of the protagonist.
The crime/thriller genre excites me because it encapsulates everything about modern people and their lives, and I love to get inside their minds as deeply as possible. Crime/thrillers are often fast-paced and exciting in their own right, but they don’t have to be superficial; they can delve and pose serious questions and explore motives.
On another level, who doesn’t want to go hunting for clues? Everyone does; everyone is a would-be Sherlock.
Oh, and we get to use some really cool pieces of kit!


Do you have a box, drawer, folder etc where you keep thoughts and ideas for future stories? Such as names you have come across, bits of dialogue, ideas, characters - even if you have no idea when you might use them?

I used to have a buff folder (everyone has one, right?) entitled Novel Ideas. It disappeared years ago. But I’m quite lucky in that I never struggle to grab a name as I’m writing and usually it fits quite well. In A Long Time Dead, my protagonist was called Jon Benedict. No idea where that came from, but during a recent re-write (2011) I binned the name in favour of Roger Conniston. The more I tried to grab the book by the scruff of the neck and turn it into something halfway decent, the more his name fought against me. Jon Benedict was damned boring and he had to go. When Roger Conniston took his place, I seemed to have no problem turning the book around – how strange is that?
Again, I’m lucky in that I seldom struggle for characters or for dialogue. I make them up and use them while writing rather than stock-pile them. And dialogue is easy anyway because all I do is transcribe what they say anyway, honest gov! Nothing to do with me!
The only things I do struggle with are story ideas. My brain is grey mush, and inside are various rooms. In one of the rooms is a chest full of ideas – and they are superb ideas! Trouble is, I’ll be buggered if I can find the damned room.
Once I do happen across a story though, I’m usually off like a shot with it and seem to have no trouble blending in subplots…

How do you manage plot bunnies (ideas that invade your mind that aren’t usually helpful to the story you’re writing but breed like...er...bunnies)?

…that add relevance to the main plot. If I create a character for a certain scene, I often wonder if I can use that character for something else, particularly if he’s a deep character, well-rounded or has an interesting story of his own – or maybe he did something or said something I wasn’t expecting that I could use in a positive way. Waste not want not, as my old fella used to say.
I usually know where a story is going from the outset (hence the problem coming by ideas), and I work towards it allowing subplots to weave their way into the main plot, but never to overcome it, or to become a distraction from it. If I find that happening or it’s running towards a dead end, I will delete the chapter/scene.
In The Third Rule, I invented a burglar who also was a wonderfully talented artist. He was there to illustrate what happened to criminals under the new justice system. But he was good. I loved writing him, and he came fully loaded with emotions and traits and… Well, when the time came to bin him, when the illustration was complete, I decided instead to keep him; I had other uses for him – further illustrations with which he would prove useful. And anyway, as I said, I liked the guy. So maybe he was a plot bunny disguised as a character (the crafty sod!) that slipped through the net.


How much of you is in your characters? Which of your characters is the you that you’d most like to be? Or be with ?

Good question. I’m pretty sure I couldn’t write a single word about a character without some of me rubbing off onto them. My protagonists, from Jon Benedict (the wimp), to Roger Conniston (the jolly nice chap), to Eddie Collins (the violent idiot with a heart of gold), are all facets of me. Sorry. Well, at least I’m honest. They are not me though, I still made them up, and they still do things differently from how I would in their situation – it’s fiction – but essentially, they are poor quality 3D photocopies of me and my persona. But hot off the copier, I spray them with chemicals that come in small plastic squeezy bottles with weird labels like Essence of Murderer, or Scent of Suicide, or even Decanted Dumbass.
(You can find these distilled wonders of the fiction-writers arsenal on the air freshener aisle of your local Asda).


Do you become so wrapped up in your writing that your spouse wonders if they're married to you or one of your characters?

Oh my, an even better question.
While reading A Long Time Dead, my then-wife burst into tears. Cripes, I thought, it must be bad! Jon Benedict, as he was back then, was having an affair, and because my blood flowed in his veins (see above), she assumed I too was having an affair. I blinked for an awfully long time when she confronted me with this, and then I didn’t help my cause by laughing so hard I fell off the chair.
On the one hand it was such a compliment that my writing even fooled my wife, but on the other it meant she didn’t really know me very well, and that I would never do a thing like that – and then write about it!
I do tend to spend an inordinate amount of time writing or being here thinking about writing. But I should put that into some kind of context I suppose. I spend an inordinate amount of my spare time writing. I worked 67 hours this week, and the first thing I did when I came home from work at midnight, or two in the morning, was grab a coffee. The second thing I did was write.


What type of book do you like reading? Is it the same genre as you write?

Yes. And no.
I recently finished a lovely book about the secrets of Bletchley Park. Six months ago I read a book about how the mind makes decisions, and a book about composite materials used in race cars, another about matter vs anti-matter. A year ago I read Ozzy Osbourne’s bio just after I finished Stephen Hawking’s The Universe in a Nutshell. I recently tried to read Ash by James Herbert, and I got part way through Under the Dome by a small-time author called Stephen King (only joking, Steve) when I was distracted by something – must return to it soon. On my shelf I have some books that I ache to get to one day: Jonathan Strange and Mr Norrell by Susanna Clarke, The Runes of the Earth by Stephen Donaldson, and Sword Song by Bernard Cornwell (I love his historical fiction), to name just a few. Of course I read thrillers too including Deaver, Hogan, Child…


What lengths do you go to to convince us readers that your book has the X factor?

In the grand scheme of things, it would be very difficult to sway a reader into opening his wallet or purse to buy my humble books. If you have a large publishing house behind you, it may be considerably easier. The only way I can get noticed is by word of mouth. But look on the positive side: it means that most of the books I’ve been lucky enough to sell have been recommended to the buyer – and that’s a compliment if ever there was one.


How do you feel when a reader points out the spelling mistake(s) you have made?

Ah well, yes! I’m thoroughly embarrassed to begin with. And then after a short while I’m very grateful that someone has taken the time to get in touch and let me know about any errors. I’ve recently completed a full read-through of the entire Dead trilogy because of one such review on Amazon that said some very complimentary things but finished off by saying it was a shame about the errors. Oops.
I don’t like the thought of people being pulled out of the story because their eye has settled on a typo, so if I can get rid of that distraction then everyone’s a winner.


What do you like most about visiting KUF/forums?

The friendliness. I have met some wonderful people on the forums that have become very close friends. They’re a great place for offering and receiving encouragement, for swapping tips and tricks, and I can safely say life would be quite a bit emptier if it were not for the forums.


What is on your near horizon?

I have recently begun writing a new novel. The working title is Angel and it’s about…


Where can we find you for more information?

I have a website at http://andrew-barrett.co.uk/
I’m on Twitter too @AndrewbarrettUK
You can also visit my Author Page on Goodreads:
And I have just begun an Author Page on KUF:
Oh, and obviously there’s an Author Page on Amazon too:
I even have a Facebook page, but I’ve absolutely no idea how to operate it.